Previous post: Krodel, Revelation
Next post: Mounce, Revelation
-
Recent Posts
- E. S. Constantinou, Andrew of Caesarea and the Apocalypse
- Pierre Prigent, Commentary on the Apocalypse
- Resseguie’s Narrative Commentary
- Carl E. Olson, Will Catholics Be “Left Behind”? (2)
- Carl E. Olson, Will Catholics Be “Left Behind”? (1)
- Ian Paul, Scholarly Developments
- Just now: Lenski’s NT commentary for only $200
- Vern S. Poythress, Understanding – and challenging – Dispensationalists
- Codex Sinaiticus is coming online
- Kenneth L. Gentry
- C. Marvin Pate (ed.), Four views
- Preterist literature
- Irena Backus, Reformation Readings of the Apocalypse
- Charles D. Alexander, Revelation Spiritually Understood
- James L. Resseguie, Revelation: A Narrative Commentary
Recent Comments
- Adamsen on Dr. Ian Paul
- Rachel Sagar on Dr. Ian Paul
- George Eldon Ladd, A Commentary on the Revelation of John on Clouse, Four views
- Konrad Huber, Einer gleich einem Menschensohn on Adamsen, Parousia and Paraenesis (abstract)
- Gunni Bjørsted, I virkelighedens lys on Vern S. Poythress, Understanding – and challenging – Dispensationalists
Revelation sites
Archives
Categories
- About Revelation Resources
- Commentators
- Criticism
- Church-historical interpretation
- Contemporary-historical criticism
- Cultic analysis
- Dramatic analysis
- Feminist criticism
- Historical analysis
- Liberation-theological criticism
- Literary analysis
- Narratological analysis
- Postcolonial criticism
- Postmodern criticism
- Process hermeneutic
- Reader-oriented criticism
- Resistance criticism
- Rhetorical studies
- Social analysis
- Social-scientific criticism
- Socio-historical analysis
- Socio-rhetorical analysis
- Traditio-historical analysis
- FAQ
- General Introduction
- History of interpretation
- History of research
- New publications
- Reception
- Relations to Judaism/Jews
- Relationship to extra-biblical literature
- Relationship to the New Testament
- The 'thousand-year' problem
- Theology
- Unfinished
- Use of the Old Testament
Michaels, Revelation
by Georg S. Adamsen on August 25, 2007
in Scholarly commentaries,Structure
Professor Michaels has written a commentary well worth the reading.
One interesting contribution is the analysis of the structure of Revelation. Michaels argues, as do others, that the so-called interlude in chapter 7 is not really an interlude.
This may suggest that the analysis of the structure of Revelation should pay careful attention to the numberings as structural markers as well as reconsider the whole concept of interludes.
Buy at Amazon: US
* UK
* DE
Tagged as: J. Ramsey Michaels