Previous post: Maier, Johannesoffenbarung
Search on my Revelation sites
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
- Georg S. Adamsen, Book of Revelation
- E. S. Constantinou, Andrew of Caesarea and the Apocalypse
- Pierre Prigent, Commentary on the Apocalypse
- Resseguie’s Narrative Commentary
- Carl E. Olson, Will Catholics Be “Left Behind”? (2)
- Carl E. Olson, Will Catholics Be “Left Behind”? (1)
- Ian Paul, Scholarly Developments
- Just now: Lenski’s NT commentary for only $200
- Vern S. Poythress, Understanding – and challenging – Dispensationalists
- Codex Sinaiticus is coming online
- Kenneth L. Gentry
- C. Marvin Pate (ed.), Four views
- Preterist literature
- Irena Backus, Reformation Readings of the Apocalypse
- Charles D. Alexander, Revelation Spiritually Understood
Revelation sites
Archives
Categories
- About Revelation Resources
- Commentators
- Criticism
- Church-historical interpretation
- Contemporary-historical criticism
- Cultic analysis
- Dramatic analysis
- Feminist criticism
- Historical analysis
- Liberation-theological criticism
- Literary analysis
- Narratological analysis
- Postcolonial criticism
- Postmodern criticism
- Process hermeneutic
- Reader-oriented criticism
- Resistance criticism
- Rhetorical studies
- Social analysis
- Social-scientific criticism
- Socio-historical analysis
- Socio-rhetorical analysis
- Traditio-historical analysis
- FAQ
- General Introduction
- History of interpretation
- History of research
- New publications
- Reception
- Relations to Judaism/Jews
- Relationship to extra-biblical literature
- Relationship to the New Testament
- The 'thousand-year' problem
- Theology
- Unfinished
- Use of the Old Testament
Bad Behavior has blocked 213 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Thomas, Revelation (2 volumes)
by Georg S. Adamsen on January 1, 2008
in Scholarly commentaries
This two-volume commentary (524 + 690 pages) is a rather detailed interpretation with a special emphasis on providing an eschatological interpretation. Many interesting and refreshing observations may be found in this commentary which, on the other hand, lacks a history of interpretation and research.
Tagged as: Robert L. Thomas